2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I'm not talking about "fewer animals". I'm talking about no animals. I don't see a reality in the vegan utopia. I don't believe in or support mass production of animals for the purpose of eating them, nor do I support the alternative, zero production. They are both on the extreme. A world where animals and human beings roam freely without one supporting the other is ludicrous.

posted 5 years, 3 months ago
view in context

In reference to Skeater's point, an interesting question to pose is:
What does he see happening to these species if they are not being eaten? Will they simply disappear from existence or thrive roaming free and in people's backyards?

posted 5 years, 3 months ago
view in context

Fergus Henderson's "The Whole Beast: Nose to Tail Eating" and Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall's "The River Cottage Meat Book". Both Brits, of course!

posted 5 years, 3 months ago
view in context

Finding pig tails, quail, beef cheeks and rabbit on the menu is just so much more exciting than finding pork loin, beef tenderloin and chicken breast. It also has a couple of unintentional results: promotes nose-to-tail eating (waste not, want not!) and invigorates a more balanced shift towards alternative commercial meat production. It shifts the paradigm from simply beef, chicken and pork to include lamb, quail, squab, rabbit and pheasant.

posted 5 years, 3 months ago
view in context