2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

This ridiculous! How can an Ethic Professor hem and haw about whether it is right to lie? The whole idea behind ethics is to say of things are right or if they are wrong. I find it hard to believe that relative ethics is so prevalent that even a specialist on ethics is bowing to the pressure and not taking a stand to say that lying is wrong. Our whole civilization is based on honesty, we cannot function without it and when we fail to value speaking truth, we will see it continue to decay all around us.

posted 4 years, 4 months ago
view in context