2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

What a horrible post you just made. Hedrick just cleared it up. His dad is involved in a civil dispute over a business contract. He's not a felon. Your post shows you're wanting this to be a tabloid not a discussion. Most businesses are involved in contract disputes at any given time. There is a certain camp out there that now sees Hedrick as a viable threat and is slinging whatever mud they can create or distort. Trust your gut people, investigate and make your own decisions. Don't believe lies! 

posted 2 years, 9 months ago
view in context

There is only one candidate that I see who saw this issue was important enough to put it in their Voter Guide statement. BTW: Hedrick is the only one. I think that speaks for itself. 

http://wei.secstate.wa.gov/osos/en/PreviousElections/2010/primary/Pages/OVG_20100817.aspx

posted 2 years, 9 months ago
view in context