2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I apologise if this seems a little intrusive, but without some sort of facts this could easily be hyperbole, and you are holding your business up as an example of one Oregon will lose if measure 67 passes. Could you please tell us what range of net/gross we are talking about and what country with socialized medicine you are talking about? I don't need an actual number, simply a broad range of income net/gross for which this is true.

If you are holding your company up as an example of what Oregon can lose, I need to know more before I can base my opinion and my vote on that situation.

posted 3 years, 3 months ago
view in context