2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I would like to have an explanation of "fiscal responsibility" as it applies to the state budget. Over 90% of the state of Oregon's budget goes to health and human services, public safety and education. It seems that these would be the things we need to protect.

No one has come forth with a solid plan that both sides of the aisle in the legislature can agree with. 

To the business owners that say their business would be "killed" by this tax, would you be willing to quote actual numbers for your business so we can decide whether or not to believe you?

posted 3 years, 4 months ago
view in context