2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

How can Lariviere present this plan with a straight face from the same university that hid a multi-million golden parachute for its athletics director, circumvented the state's agreement on furloughs for classified workers, obfuscated/foot dragged on public records, etc.? And now they want to be TRUSTED with less oversight and in Phil Knight's words, allowed to act as a private university? Knight also says one of the most important things Lariviere will do with this plan in significantly raise tuition for in-state students. How is this helpful to Oregonians, not just UO? 

posted 2 years, 4 months ago
view in context

Pres Wiewel makes a great point. The Legislature can and often does sweep tuition that students pay FOR THEIR EDUCATION and uses it for other state agency purposes. That's a shell game we can no longer afford.

posted 2 years, 4 months ago
view in context