2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Marijuana permits are private, too. And if you have one, you can assume the growing permits of as many as 7 other card-holders (number needs confirmed), and grow up to 99 plants without the FBI taking interest (number also needs verified). That's about $100,000 worth or illegal drugs next door. Wouldn't that be a bigger concern?

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

I worked as a reporter when I first moved out here from Ohio and came to disagree with the privileges afforded to me. It's not like that back there, and I wonder how many other states operate this way (unfortunately I can't listen right now).

Either city council should have some time to speak with or without attorney's, or everyone should have the right to attend %100 of their meetings.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context