2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber language law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Most of the news I get comes from online sources so I would not be opposed to having even more news sources online. However, the idea of not being able to sit down at a coffee shop or even in between classes to read the paper is scary. I think taking away print sources will have a dramatic and possibly devastating effect on print news agancies. The ads in papers will also be ten times more annoying once they're online.

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context