2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

After listening to this morning's interview with John Kitzhaber, by husband and I replayed Chris Dudley's interview.  We both came to the same conclusion.  The interviewer threw "soft balls" at Chris Dudley and failed to follow-up on her line of questioning regarding his philosophy about taxes in general.  There was also no analysis by experts at the end of the interview with Chris Dudley with regards to his performance and philosophies.

The interviewer today was much more in-depth with difficult questions.  John Kitzhaber answered them frankly and intelligently.  There was an extremely critical analysis by so-called experts of John Kitzhaber at the end of his interview today.  Why is that?

posted 2 years, 7 months ago
view in context