2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

From what I read and what my life-time experience tought me I can see that that Maggie Gallagher is nothing but a single mother who got quite not enough sex in her life and who is seeing every man around her as a competitor for her manhunt. She just can't accept the fact that two man can love each other and not her or any woman. At this point I actually agree that now days a gay couple can resolve most of the issues of protecting each other and not have a marriage. Notorized agreement gan give the hospital rights, inherite properties from one to each other and so on. But in my case no matter what I do there's no way to bring my spouse to US. There's no legal way to bring same-sex spouse. And that is what I want to change. Call it any way you want: legal union, domestic parthnership, civil union, marriage - I don't care, but we need the same immigration rights as straight people!

posted 2 years, 4 months ago
view in context