2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

If this program is intended as a discussion of Tri-Met's on-going financial and service woes, wouldn't it be useful to have someone on the panel who is a critic of the agency?  This panel appears to be nothing but mass transit cheerleaders, who are unlikely to be able to provide your listeners with a balanced viewpoint.  I would suggest amending this group by adding a John Charles or Steve Schopp or Mel Zucker to give at least the appearance of fairness and a balanced discussion that might benefit your listeners.

posted 2 years, 5 months ago
view in context