2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

The Bill of Rights Article I - does not apply to schools, they are considered exempt,  if you do more research you will find that schools have suspended the right of self expression for children, and schools limit what kids and teachers can wear. 

Of course clothing carries a message, that is why some school district do not allow certain type of clothing or colors,  because they identify a gang.

So if that is the case why should religious clothing be allowed?

posted 3 years, 4 months ago
view in context

I remember the excitment of the moment - we hoped that the soldiers would support the students - we hoped that China could follow the eastern block countries and simply walk away from Communism, or in the very least give in a little. But unfortunately the people (soldiers and goverment) felt so threatened they could not give an inch.

It was an incredibly sad day because not only did many people/students die but their cause and hope  was squashed. Now slowly the 'revolution' is becoming real due to economic growth.

posted 4 years ago
view in context