2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Do abusers use the only skill set for human interaction that they have?  Would it help to give men a better skill set earlier?

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context

having parents involved with class is about teaching parents how to parent . It isn't about party time.

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

School should be for education not parenting, yes, but the state suffers from bad parenting and pays big for it. Teachers need development time because people who don't understand what happens in the classroom mandate things that obstruct the teachers attempts to educate and change lables to make it look like they are doing something then blame teachers when it doesn't work. If you want better education, let teachers teach.

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

I am at a loss as to where to get facts that back up a statement like,"Central Oregon's economy etc." Does it have to be big and growing to sustain the people in the area?

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context

Yes. It seems to me that the people in the area now, not those with the most money to throw at it, should have first say about how the land will be used.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context

There are a lot more questions than just do or don't. I would like to see a list of some of the questions and of places to get facts instead of oppinions about resourses, finances and impact.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context

I hadn't read your post when I made mine. you say it better. Resorts aren't a monolithic organization and they could be restructured to better asure benefit to all involved.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context

The question is not resorts yes or no but what are the resources, how is it managed, what is the impact/contribution. Resorts differ as do costs and benefits. Could you talk about ways to structure and assess

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context