Suggest a Topic
RECENTLY ON TOL:
TOL Our Town
- A tumblr site dedicated to the people and places that make up Oregon and Southwest Washington.
TAGS:
2012 conventions
2012 election
2013 session
2013 special election
arts
arts and culture
author
ballot measures
bomb
books
budget
bullying
business
charlie hales
children
clackamas
climate change
coal
courts
crime
culture
culture club
democrats
drugs
economy
education
environment
family
film
fluoride
food
gay rights
guns
handguns
health
health care
health insurance
high school
history
housing
immigration
international
internet
kitzhaber
law
legislature
lgbt
literary arts
living
marijuana
medicine
mental health
military
minor parties
mohamed mohamud
movies
music
native americans
news
newspaper
obama
olympics
oregon
our town
parenting
pers
photography
police
politcs
politics
port
portland
portland business journal
portland mayor
president
prevention
public safety
religion
republicans
rnc
romney
rural
salem
sam adams
sandy hook
schools
science
shooting
sports
suicide
supreme court
taxes
television
terrorism
theater
third parties
timber payments
transportation
union
university of oregon
violence
washington
water
wildfire
women
see all tags >>
Robert Friel's comments:
on School Trips
"Because Enlightenment understandings of rationality reign above all other considerations at Reed, experimentation with drugs is taken out of any context (moral, etc.) other than that of objective scientific enquiry."
I'm not really sure what you mean by this, but I'm a current Reed student and this doesn't sound like an attitude that I've ever heard at Reed. I've heard Reedies discuss drug use in moral terms on plenty of occasions, and I've never heard a Reedie express the view that "objective scientific enquiry" is the only "context" in which life should be viewed. Where do you get this impression from?
"Friends of mine who took their young children to Ren Fayre this year said they were disgusted by the lack of consideration shown by students--young adults, afterall, not children still home and in the care of their parents."
There are places that are just not set up to handle children, and Renn Fayre is one of them. Another example is the workplace: if you brought your kids to work, and they went around asking questions and bothering people (as kids tend to do), your co-workers would be understandably reluctant to drop everything and attend to them. Similarly, although it's the responsibility of Reedies to be considerate of children if they're there, Renn Fayre is planned without children in mind, and it shows in its structure and content. I don't mean any offense to your friends, since I don't know their motivation, but why would a parent bring their children into an environment that cannot, and was not intended to, accommodate their needs?
I'm not really sure what you mean by this, but I'm a current Reed student and this doesn't sound like an attitude that I've ever heard at Reed. I've heard Reedies discuss drug use in moral terms on plenty of occasions, and I've never heard a Reedie express the view that "objective scientific enquiry" is the only "context" in which life should be viewed. Where do you get this impression from?
"Friends of mine who took their young children to Ren Fayre this year said they were disgusted by the lack of consideration shown by students--young adults, afterall, not children still home and in the care of their parents."
There are places that are just not set up to handle children, and Renn Fayre is one of them. Another example is the workplace: if you brought your kids to work, and they went around asking questions and bothering people (as kids tend to do), your co-workers would be understandably reluctant to drop everything and attend to them. Similarly, although it's the responsibility of Reedies to be considerate of children if they're there, Renn Fayre is planned without children in mind, and it shows in its structure and content. I don't mean any offense to your friends, since I don't know their motivation, but why would a parent bring their children into an environment that cannot, and was not intended to, accommodate their needs?
posted 5 years ago
view in context
