2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

As far as the current mix of hydro, coal, wind, natural gas and other methods we use to generate electricity, it took us over 100 years to get to where we are today.  It will take more time than most folks realize to make significant changes OR it will cost more money than most folks realize!

The various proposals for changes in electricity generation, like 25 percent renewables by 2025 (pick whatever catchy numerical couplet you like) should come with a price tag attached.  We can employ the same committee to generate the cost estimates as is used for State of Oregon ballot measures. 

Without an up-front agreement on price, these fast-track proposals ring hollow, and pose a potential economic hardship on our region - especially on our low-income citizens. 

posted 4 years ago
view in context