2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

We look to our media outlets to explore the truth of our world, the question leads to whether a law was broken.

The problem I see is the response of Sam and his Staff to the question. The lie of course reeks of coverup. The hiring of a consultant and couch to aid in that coverup is in excusiable. They turned this from a simple question which should have had a simple answer into a question of what are the appropriate means and methods of our public officials. Can we move forward with an administration who are willing to do what ever needs to be done to protect their interest at the exspense of the publics interest. This is what we are moving away from on the national level, let's move away from it in oregon. Lets have a transparent, open, truthfull Government.

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context