2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

We're not talking about millionaire liberals with this measure. We are talking about millionaires silencing the voices of WORKING PEOPLE.

Vote NO on Measure 64!

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context

As Ms Frane pointed out, a single, out of state donor like Millionaire Loren Parks can cut a check for a million bucks to Bill Sizemore for his ridiculous plots.

When union members VOLUNTEER to pay for political funds, Sizemore wants to forbid us to make our little donations through payroll deductions.

We've told Sizemore NO at least THREE TIMES.

What part of NO don't you understand, Mr. Sizemore?

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context

Measure 64, like almost all Sizemore stunts, is an attempt to silence the voices of working families in Oregon. Sizemore trots these oinkers out year after year, and they are defeated every time.

What sort of respect does that show Oregon voters? Sizemore isn't capable of taking "No" for an answer.

The real agenda behind these Sizemore initiatives is to divert resources from progressive issues. Sizemore works for big corporate interests who have a major stake in driving down working conditions for Oregon's working families.

Let's tell him "No" one more time.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context

Mr Eichler is right on both Measures 63 and 64. Those, along with other Bill Sizemore initiatives, seem designed with pure public vandalism in mind. If it has Sizemore's name on it, I am very, very wary.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context