2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I think there's a term for what this is about... Load Balancing. Every network is faced with load issues, and every network has to either manage traffic or increase the physical investment. I work on software that analyzes network metrics and identifies root causes of problems. This is all rule based, and does not involve some observer judging whether the content is politically correct. While one can imagine some kind of analysis that could identify specific content, there's nothing inherent in load balancing that makes this more or less possible. They're unrelated issues, but both probably should be subject to some form of oversight.

posted 5 years, 1 month ago
view in context