2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber language law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Talk about repeat offenders: how long must Kevin Mannix continue to muck with our legislative process by putting emotionally charged issues before the public vote -- issues which should more properly be considered by the legislature.  We elect our legislature to consider and maintain the big picture of our laws, and we hold our legislators accountable when we elect them (or not).  

No one is accountable when issues like the penal code and tax policy are decided by the public at large.  These issues cannot be decided piece-by-piece through the ballot.  Rather than resulting in sound policies, this process just feeds the political egos of personalities like Mr. Mannix who can't get his extreme ideas passed by the Senate and House and signed by the governor.

posted 2 years, 7 months ago
view in context