2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I am a zoology major, who went into medicine. Oregon Field Guide has repeated a program about Spirit Lake that showed these large rainbow trout that appeared to grow extremely fast but did not live beyond a certain young age, well below what is found in the wild.

Is this still the current truth and if so, why not let these large trout be fished? Or at least why was this not part of the discussion?

I have no interest in fishing just the science of what is going on with these trout and Spirit Lake. Thanks.

posted 4 years, 1 month ago
view in context