2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

For those of us who object to homosexual activity, for religious reasons, this whole thing has been fairly predictable. However, if we are going to talk about anyone's private life down to the point of their consensual sex, or a lie about it, few would be able to cast the first stone.

This has gone on long enough. I think that the mayor's work for the city has been good. Any more mudslinging will cripple the city council's important work in a time of great change. Could we change the subject?

Jo Anna

posted 3 years, 12 months ago
view in context