2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber language law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

for BT or Sara

Can you clarify who is responsible for payment for accredation and why OSB and or DOE chose not to renew?

BT

Could you explain the ture costs of maintaining students who come to OSB vs those who do not including the cost of Fed social security if data is kept, providing a realistic view of actual costs savings as anticipated by ways and means?

BT 

Please introduce the Failing letter so the public can see that there is a desire for the donor family that a school for the blind be maintained on this site.

That there is a cloud over the title and acting to disolve the OSB Board, or close the school could cause Oregon taxpayers unknown amounts in litigating the outcome.

Is this the most reasonable course of action at this time for our legislative reps to take?

posted 3 years, 11 months ago
view in context