2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

I think a tax on any non-reusable bag would be best.  I wonder if because Oregon has a large timber and paper manufacturing industry, is this influencing senator Haas' push to ban plastic bags?  Also, was any of the campaign contributions he accepted derived from any timber or paper lobbying group/idustry?  Why wouldn't Haas advocate for a tax on both paper and plastic if he REALLY wanted to help the enviornment?

posted 3 years, 4 months ago
view in context