2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I do not necessarily buy the argument that building a new bridge with an increase in lanes is counter to Oregon environmental goals. If the traffic is backed up for miles and miles, bumper to bumper, the engines are still on and emitting pollution. Those current traffic jams can take well over an hour to go from moving traffic to crossing the river and back to moving traffic. If we can keep the traffic moving and reduce the transit time, we are actually reducing the specific environmental exposure to the area.

posted 4 years, 11 months ago
view in context