2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Death Row is no place for anybody but how can we argue these people don't deserve it when they have in most cases taken someones life?

I am sure the individual will pay for his crimes but is Death Row and the Death penalty justice or would it be better to keep this person alive and make them suffer? The families have to live with the pain of a family loss for the rest of their lives so why shouldnt he?

Thanks,
Paddy

Office Cleaning Leeds
Nail Technician Courses
Food Hygiene Certificate
Online Accounting Software
Pet Food

posted 2 years, 7 months ago
view in context