2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I had the feeling with Boneshaker that I was reading part 1 of a series. It lays the groundwork for any number of sequels, while remaining perhaps too open ended.

My favorite aspect of the book (besides the term 'Rotters'; perfect!) was the multicultural cast and the aknowledgement of a rigid class distinction. I feel strongly that steampunk liturature works best when it addresses these issues. In fact, I feel that is what puts the punk in steampunk: the chance to expose and address the seamy underbelly of the 19th century.

I would love to see a sequel entirely from the point of view of the Chinese characters who live within the city.

If I had one complaint though it would be the fact that Briar is almost entirely defined by her relationship to the three men in her life, her father, her husband and her son. I find that I can't remember any other defining characteristics of "the Widow Blue". Was this intentional?

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context