2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

One of Maggie's arguments against same-sex marriage is based on opposite-sex relationships being the only way children can be created.  I've heard this many times from same-sex opponents.  A question for her: what happens when science allows two same-sex people to have a child?  Will two women who have an embryo created from their eggs, and one of them then carries the baby to term, be allowed to marry because they've had a child that is biologically theirs?

posted 2 years, 4 months ago
view in context