2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

We've chosen to set up a system where trained people area able to respond in emergency situations. This could apply to the mental health field if we, as a society, chose to set up the system to respond to mental health emergencies as well. We simply have chosen not to prioritize this segment of society. It seems as though this conversation has been discussing systemic changes in the police department, but perhaps the systemic changes could include other systems as well.

posted 3 years, 3 months ago
view in context

With this most recent event in mind, my question is: Why are the police the lead agents on suicide calls in the first place? If there is a fire, the fire department handles the fire. The police attend to handle other public safety issues, like preventing a crowd from approaching the flames. Wouldn't properly trained mental health professionals be better equipped to deal with community members dealing with emotional pain?

posted 3 years, 3 months ago
view in context