2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I think this change, regardless of whatever political fight may have pushed it out abruptly, is a good one. But I would like to know what steps will now be taken to curb the unnecessary fatalities and liberal use of tazers. Extra training? More independent oversight? I think both of these are necessary.

As for funding I think they should get that money to keep the cold case files department open, but not without some serious reform in the areas mentioned above.

posted 3 years ago
view in context